Friday, 30 January 2015

HeForShe: The Impact 10x10x10 Speech Spoof


HeForShe: The Impact 10x10x10 Speech Spoof


Femifascist, feminazis, FlyingCircus, humor, news, video,
Impact 10x10x10: we want names, we want numbers!


Video




Video Transcript


“Since the "HeForShe" launch in New York last September, I think it would be fair to say, that my colleagues and I have been stunned by the lack of response. The "HeForShe" conference was watched, in disbelief,  over 11 million times, but only got 200,000 signatures.  It sparked 1.2 billion social media conversations, mostly about male owners of female cats, culminating in the "HeForShe" hashtag becoming so popular, that Twitter painted it on the bathroom walls of its DETROIT headquarters, and, men from almost every country in the world made the commitment never to visit DETROIT. Everyone from Desmond Two-two,  to Prince Harry, to Hilary Clinton, to Yoko Ono,  have issued their support or contacted us since September 20th . I mean, it's not like they have to be at a 9 to 5 job, or anything, and they all want to shag me too!

Everything from marathons being run in the dead of winter, merchandise being created for profit, 15 year old boys writing to national newspapers deploring female discrimination in order to impress their female friends, young girls collecting hundreds of signatures,  it’s all happened in the last 4 months. I couldn’t have DREAMED it (!) but it’s happened. People know my name now! Thank you so much for watching and thank you so much for your support by subconsciously re-watching Harry Potter movies so I can rake in even more royalties, suckas.

What is IMPALE 10x10x10? It’s about bullying governments, businesses and universities and coercing them to make concrete commitments to our distorted version of gender equality.  But I want to pressure the human beings that are behind these organizations. I spoke about some of my story in September - what are your stories?  Just female stories though.  It is after all "HeForShe", not, "She-for-He."

Girls, who have been your mentors? Parents did you make sure you treated your children equally? If so how have you done it, because I know jack-shit about parenting! I can't even keep a spider-plant alive. Husbands have you been supporting your female partner privately so that she can fulfill her dreams too, no matter how bizarre, disloyal, or adulterous? Young men have you spoken up in a conversation when a woman was casually degraded or dismissed? Did you pause the porno, and say, "Hey, I would still do that fatty!" How did this affect you? Did you start dating large women? How did this affect the woman you stepped up for? How did you take action when you became aware a woman was a victim of violence? Did you join a mob a beat the accused man senseless before his trial? Business men have you mentored, supported, or engaged women in leadership positions? Did you tell the white male with 10 more years of experience to shove it? Writers have you challenged the language and imagery used to portray women? Have you put halo's around every woman's head, and photo shopped men to appear fatter, darker and more sinister? CEO’s have you implemented the women’s empowerment principles in your own company? Have you put "HeForShe"  stickers on every conceivable surface? What change have you seen? Have male employees adapted to the removal of patriarchal urine-alls?  Have men stopped man-spreading in their cubicles? Are you someone that has been persuading men to become HeForShe’s, in front of women looking on,  and collecting their signatures for our database? How many have you got? We want to know. We want to know who is not obeying!

One of the biggest pieces of feedback I’ve had since my speech is that people want to help but they aren’t sure how best to do it, legally.

Manginas say they have signed the petition But they asked What now?

The truth is the ‘what now’ is down to you. That gives us plausible deniability. What your "HeForShe" commitment will be is personal. As in personal belongings, personal assets, and even your job.  And there is no ‘best’ way, everything is valid. But if you are really stuck, watch a really messy divorce, and pay out whatever the court orders the man to pay, and do that. Not married? Then pick any female working a menial job, and give her the windfall.  It's the least you can do for your thought-crimes, you god-damn oppressor!


Decide what your commitment is, make it a public shaming, and then please report back to us on your humiliation, if you are still alive,  so that we can share your reparations story. We want to support, guide and reinforce male efforts. IMPALE 10x10x10 is about concrete commitments to obey, the visibility of these commitments to obey, and the measurability of them too , in dollar amounts. How has the campaign IMPALEd me so far?  I’ve had my breath taken away, when an alpha male took me from behind, and whispered the part of my speech that went, "If not me, who? If not now, when?". I’ve been stunned by the amount of men in my life that have contacted me since my speech to tell me just what they want to do to me, and it just turns me on!

While I would love to claim that the success of the "HeForShe" campaign is a direct result of my 14 year old male Harry Potter fans. I know that it is not. It is because I am woman, and I have a vagina. It is my belief that there is a greater need than ever that I, Emma Watson, need to be an equal participant in your homes, your societies, in your governments, and in your work places. And they know that the world is being held back in every way because they are not me. Half of them are not even female! Women share this planet 50/50 and they are massively neglected and underrepresented, their irrational potential astonishingly untapped. We are very excited to be launching IMPALE 10x10x10 to bring "HeForShe" into its next INDOCTRINATION phase. If you are a "He-She", you are a tranny. If you’re a "HeForShe" - and I am assuming you are because otherwise it could become quite uncomfortable for you - I’m here to ask you what is the impact you can have? How, what, where, when and with who? We want names, numbers, contacts! We want to help you, help us and we want to know.... EVERYTHING. Ask not what a woman can do for you. But what you can do for a woman.
  The artist formerly known as Emma Watson


Saturday, 24 January 2015

Woman sees package, gains 50 pounds.


Woman sees package, gains 50 pounds.


Canadian MGTOW Flying Circus:  Episode 1
Canadian MGTOW Flying Circus:  Episode 1

The Video




Video Transcript

This is Canadian MGTOW.  Having fun, and not giving a shit...

Welcome to my first "Canadian MGTOW Flying Circus" Video.  This will be the first in a series in which I will look at the lighter side of life.

Today's video is called, Woman sees package, gains 50 pounds.

No, this is not a story about a woman joining "the cake of the month club."  This is a real news story from Britain in which a man was found guilty of having sex with a mailbox.  I guess he either took the slang term box literally, or perhaps British women are uglier than those on Coronation Street!

45-year-old Paul pleaded guilty to two counts of indecent exposure, and using threatening and abusive words. Witnesses saw Paul pull down his pants and publicly insert his penis into a mailbox.  The prosecuting  attorney, Kate, said Paul walked over to the mailbox and quote "started to make sexual advances towards it." un-quote.

Paul's attorney said his client understood that he left witnesses disgusted and ashamed. I'm not sure why witnesses would be ashamed,  it wasn't their package on display.  Anyhow, Paul received 12 months of community sentence with a requirement for alcohol treatment.   He was also ordered to pay £150 (approximately $275) in court costs, and a £60 victim surcharge.  No word if the mailbox  received this money.

Of course, I cannot end this video without the gynocentric element of the story.   Paul was also ordered to pay £50 (approximately $92) in compensation to the victim.  No, not the mailbox, but a woman who simply witnessed the sex act.  Hence, if you are a woman in Britain, and you see a package, you will gain 50 pounds!

So the woman, who has probably seen a penis before, gets paid money, while poor drunk Paul gets to sign the sex offenders registry. No word on how the mailbox is doing, nor any mention of its victim impact statement.

This concludes this video... If you enjoyed it, please comment, rate, and subscribe.  Thank you. This is Canadian MGTOW, signing off! Save yourself! Go MGTOW...

And don't screw a mailbox.



Tuesday, 20 January 2015

Woman runs over 3 teenagers: She is the victim!

 Woman runs over 3 teenagers: She is the victim!




Video



 


Transcript





This is Canadian MGTOW.  Having fun, and not giving a shit about Sharlene.





Today's video is called, Woman runs over teenagers, then sues for emotional trauma.



Richard was 16, when he and 2 friends were riding their bicycles down a country road back in October of 2012, around 1:30 am.  The trio (all teenage boys) were struck from behind by an SUV driven by Sharlene Simon.  One teen, Brandon, was pronounced dead 2 hours later. Richard spent weeks in hospital recovering from broken bones,  and a broken pelvis.  The 3rd teen was not seriously hurt.



Toxicology reports showed no alcohol, nor drugs, in the boys' systems at the time of the accident. The teen that was killed, was hit with such force by the SUV that he dented the bumper, cracked the windshield, dented the roof before landing on the road to die.   Richard is still in pain and in therapy, and "will almost certainly never be the same," said his father.



Although the female driver admitted to driving over the speed limit, doing 90 km/h in an 80 zone, she was soon allowed to leave the scene of the accident by police,  although other witnesses could not leave for another 4 hours.  Although the investigation cited "lack of visibility" of the cyclists was the largest factor on a dark, overcast night, the driver reported to police that she thought she had struck a deer. The father of the dead teen was quoted as saying, "Well, I’ve never seen a deer riding a bicycle with reflectors and a bright yellow jacket on. There is no reason she didn’t see them – you can see a mouse run across that straight stretch of road at night ... I would like to know why she wasn’t charged and why she and her husband were allowed to leave the scene."  Her husband who was following in another car, is a police officer.



Shortly after the accident, a couple caught just a glint of the red bicycle reflectors, and stopped.  The man found Richard in the ditch, while his wife, a teacher,  held Brandon's hand as he lay dying in the middle of the road.  Sharlene Simon's husband, rushed up to the teacher to ask their location so he could call police.  He returned to his wife's damaged vehicle and did NOT return.  Why did he not administer any first aid?  He was a policeman himself after all.  Any police officer has the duty, and moral obligation ,to assist anyone in an accident, especially three kids just run over by someone. And how is it that the couple attending to the boys could see the bike reflectors, while Sharlene could not? The accident was so horrific, an online news source in the United States, called Streets blog USA, awarded Charlene Simon the 2014 “Hell on Wheels” award. 



In the comments section of one news site, covering this accident, a commenter stated, "Those parents were my childhood friends, and it's still affecting them. It was a native cop who used his race as an excuse to get off easy, and he never once apologized, or said a word to the parents, who will never be the same again." The brother of the killed teenager had taken the death very hard. Six months after, the older brother of Brandon died in his sleep from a combinations of pills and alcohol.



So what is a woman to do after she runs over 3 cyclists, and ends up killing one of them, and a 2nd one indirectly?  She sues of course!  The lawyer for the victim's family said, "In my entire career I’ve never heard of anyone ever suing a dead child that they killed. It’s horrible. This is not a counter suit – it has nothing to do with the insurance." 





She blames the teen boys for the accident, her Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, and wants her counselling covered by the proceeds.  Oh. And she also wants her SUV fixed, including the front end alignment.  She is suing for 1.35 million dollars.  All this 18 months after the accident!  She did not sustain any physical injuries at the time of the accident, but according to a statement of claim filed in Ontario Superior Court,  Sharlene Simon "has sustained and will sustain great pain and suffering" including “a severe shock to her system” as a result of the crash. The document continues on and says, "Her enjoyment of life has been and will be lessened."



After reading that last line, I am simply beside myself.  Is this simply a case of severe mental illness, or low intelligence?  Perhaps a case of solipsism?  Or maybe a very perverse after effect from our gynocentric society? It would really be interesting to see how this story would of played out had the teenagers all been young women.  What are your thoughts? 



Sharlene's "enjoyment of life" may of been lessened, but not as much as Brandon's.
 

Saturday, 17 January 2015

Why Charlie Hebdo Would Not Happen Here - Canadian MGTOW

Why Charlie Hebdo Would Not Happen Here - Canadian MGTOW

Butt Hurt Cream!
Butt Hurt Cream!




The Video





 Video Transcript



This is Canadian MGTOW.  Having fun, and not giving a shit...



Today's video is called, Why Charlie Hebdo Would Not Happen Here.


On 7 January 2015, two Islamist gunmen (directed by an "Al Qaeda cell in Yemen") forced their way into and opened fire in the Paris headquarters of Charlie Hebdo, killing twelve, including staff cartoonists Charb, Cabu, Honoré, Tignous and Wolinski, economist Bernard Maris and two police officers, and wounding eleven, four of them seriously.



Some people in Canada, and North America as a whole, said that couldn't happen here. Regular bullshit lines like, "we don't allow as many immigrants from 'that' part of the world", or just blind faith in our security agencies.  It's not an organization, not a government body, not even an organized army, yet if permeates every section of everyday life.  No, what really would prevent an attack would be a force that is the twin sister of feminism. No, it's not equality.  No, it's not freedom.   It's political correctness.



One opinion piece on Sun News asked the question what if Charlie Hebdo was published somewhere else like Britain.  What follows are some of their speculations mixed with my own of what would happen if Charlie Hebdo was published in Canada.  I'll let my American viewers make their own judgements, on how things might of turned out if Charlie Hebdo was published in the US.  Perhaps they can play the game of W.W.O.D. 


What would, Obama Do?




Our universities would, when they are not busy stifling debate, would forbid the magazine on campuses, while a few students would protest outside of the Hebdo office. This would eagerly be covered by the CBC.  For those outside of Canada, it is our national, publicly funded broad caster, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.  Quite often derided as being the Communist Broadcasting Corporation for its leftist views.  Quite recently, in real life,  David Studer, the head of journalism standards and practices at CBC, sent a note to staff saying they would not offend Muslims. "We are not showing cartoons making fun of the Prophet Mohammad. Other elements of Charlie Hebdo's con-tent and style are fine, but this area should be avoided as, quite simply, it's offensive to Muslims as a group," Studer wrote.  CBC's standards include offending Catholics but keeping Muslims happy.  When Pope Benedict resigned, the CBC had no problems showing cartoons about this news event, including one of the Pope embracing a Swiss Guard, while saying "Free at last." The cartoon implied that the Pope had resigned to be with his gay lover.  I guess offending Catholics is okay.  They are a group of typically white men, and we all know that it is open season on white men.



Naturally, the next step would be a Change.org petition.  Our social justice warriors, would demand bookstores, grocery stores, basically anyone from selling the magazine.  They would claim islamaphobia, while ignoring that other religions that are mocked as well.  The stores would relent, thinking 1000 butt-hurt people represents 100,000 customers, and stop carrying the magazine.  Some smaller obscure stores would carry it but nervously put in behind the copies of Hustler and Penthouse.  Our biggest book retailer, Indigo,  would pull the magazine well before the hoopla.  The instance anything mocked Jewish people or Israel, the head of the chain, Heather Reisman, would pull it.  Not a far stretch of the imagination.  She made news years ago, when she refused to carry copies of Hitler's book, Mein Kumph.  You won't find it on any shelves in her stores, as you have to special order it.



Of course, what is a petition without a hash-tag?  These Hash-tags would be something un-original like "Stop Charlie".  Something more honest would be, "Because Butt Hurt", "Stifle Debate", "End Free Speech",  "Accommodate Everything", "Gutless",  and "Fear their Religion."




Of course no twitter storm goes un-exploited.  The Liberal party leader, and male feminist, Justin Trudeau, would jump behind it, as well as the NDP.  To protect their re-election prospects, the Conservatives would jump on board.



One of the magazine's editors would visit one of the universities to speak about "freedom of the press", but would be shouted down at the beginning of his talk with chants of "Racist", "Islamophobe", and some 4 word chant that rhymes.  Some students, unaware of history, will find it cute to burn the magazines on campus.  Those who think this is far-fetched, it is not.  Anyone deemed to be an anti-abortionist, right-wing (as was the case with Ann Coulter), or, gasp..., a men's right's advocate, would of seen these talks cancelled, shouted down, or worse. In the case of a men's rights speaker, they first shouted him down, then pulled the fire alarm, effectively ending the lecture.   Recently, one professor of Islamic studies and journalism, was quoted as saying that Prime Minister Harper using the word barbaric to describe the terrorist attack at Hebdo, was "too much" and gives the discussion a "moralistic tone."  Sadly, this professor is training the next generation of journalists.  They "might" be brave enough to say, "I am Charlie.", but won't show the cartoons.  Perhaps in the future, these attacks will simply be referred to as, "Ballistic Vandalism."



Continuing on with this theoretical scenario....



 Naturally a complaint would be made to the Canadian Human Rights Commission. It's purpose is to investigate, and settle complaints of discrimination, in employment and in services under federal jurisdiction.  Under the Employment Equity Act, they ensure that equal opportunities are provided for Canada's four most cherished groups:  Aboriginal people, the disabled, visible minorities, and of course women.  They will simply complain that Hebdo does not employ enough visible minorities.  More fodder for the mainstream press.



Defeated, the editor would leave the hall, through a throng of protestors.  The editor would be jostled, lose his balance and bump into someone who immigrated from Syria.  The immigrant would fall to the ground, cameras focussed on her pained and surprised expression. Bonus points if the Syrian was wearing a hockey jersey, and the fall caused him to spill his drink, Canada's national drink, Tim Horton's Coffee. This would surpass the time a protestor got too close to the previous prime minister, and was pushed away by the leader.  He simply used his hand to push the protestor's face out of the way, but it was a topic of debate for weeks.   I found it charming when the Prime Minister later told reporters that he, "Took him out."



The national news would feature 4 or 5 person panels debating the recent events, but it would be a joke, because all the panelists would be from left leaning media outlets.  All would agree that things were escalating, and that someone might get seriously injured, or killed!  What if the coffee that was spilled, had burned a hemophiliac baby in a stroller?  What if this lead to hate crimes against the place that sells falafels?  We are all foodies aren't we? Oh, and I just love Hummus!



Eventually some reporter would dig up dirt on the editor.  They would find out he made legal campaign contributions to a politician who made an off-colour remark 17 years ago.   Leaked police records would show the high cost of police protection during the various protests and failed lecture attempts.  An investigative report on TV would exclaim that the editor never travelled anywhere in the middle east, so he simply must be racist.  A grocery store cashier would be interviewd, in a dark room, and his voice electronically altered.  The explosive relevation would come forward that the editor would buy bread every week, but it would always be WHITE bread!



Various immigrant groups, social justice groups, and a high profile lawyer, would take legal action against the magazine.  In Britain they would make reference to 3 different laws; incitement to racial hatred, malicious communications, and public disorder.  In Canada it would be a more streamlined process, and simply fall under the umbrella of a hate-crime!  Whether the case was one or not, with declining sales, negative press, and various employees leaving for quieter and safer jobs, the magazine would fold, much like most Canadian magazines eventually do under the crush of American publishing giants.  In the rare event that the magazine moved overseas, and a similar attack occurred at their new location the dialogue would be, "Good thing  they moved out of Canada!  Those could of been Canadians that were shot!"  Any mention of free speech would be absent as the discussion would inevitably turn to gun control, and how much safer we are to live in a country like Canada where we are truly free to express ourselves.



The policy of APPEASEMENT never works to protect any country's security.  If you are MGTOW, you know how debating, or even questioning  a feminist can devolve into name calling and being branded out of hand, as a misogynist.  As the evil twin sister of feminism, this political correctness serves only to shut down debate.  I used to think it was just a way for a hyper-sensitive, idiot,  to be a grammar nazi.  In truth, it is intellectual terrorism.  It does nothing but kill discussion.  Once you control the language, you control the thoughts.  In the end, political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hate.



With bullying being such a hot topic for the past 5 years, how do these politically correct minions reconcile their political correctness on the one hand, and their stance of bullying on the other.  Do they not see that this is bullying by a small group?  Perhaps, this is why political correctness is a constantly moving line. Growing up in Canada in the 1970s, disabled people were simply referred to as, crippled.  This later changed to handicapped, which later changed to physically disabled.  Physically disabled, then changed to, physically challenged.  But I guess no one likes a challenge, so now it is being called, "Differently abled."  What will they call it next?  Walking intolerant?



In conclusion, the terrorists have already won, and quite a while ago too.  Islamic fanaticism thrives on secrecy, censorship and fear, threatening all those who dare raise their voices against it.  Most media in Canada have not shown the cartoons.  So when fanaticism arrives here and goes nuclear, will our journalists simply "Duck, and Cover."  I think so.



This concludes this article... If you enjoyed this video, please comment, rate and subscribe.  Thank you. This is Canadian MGTOW, signing off! Save yourself! Go MGTOW...